Certified: The CISSP Prepcast

Welcome to The Bare Metal Cyber CISSP Prepcast. This series helps you prepare for the ISC squared CISSP exam with focused explanations and practical context.
In today’s episode, we’re exploring three critical security testing methodologies: Static Application Security Testing, known as S A S T; Dynamic Application Security Testing, or D A S T; and Interactive Application Security Testing, referred to as I A S T. Each of these techniques plays a pivotal role in identifying vulnerabilities, supporting secure development, and enhancing your software’s overall security posture. As a future Certified Information Systems Security Professional, you need to understand the unique strengths, use cases, and integration points of S A S T, D A S T, and I A S T to implement comprehensive and effective security testing strategies across your software development lifecycle.
Let’s begin by understanding Static Application Security Testing. S A S T is a white-box testing method that analyzes application source code, bytecode, or binaries without executing the application. It’s typically performed early in the development lifecycle, often during the coding phase, before the application is compiled or run.
S A S T tools scan for vulnerabilities such as buffer overflows, injection flaws, insecure cryptographic implementations, and hard-coded credentials. Because S A S T has full visibility into the code, it provides detailed feedback to developers, including the exact location of the vulnerability, its severity, and remediation guidance.
This early feedback enables developers to fix issues before they make it into production, when fixes become more expensive and time-consuming. S A S T also enforces secure coding standards and helps teams comply with frameworks like OWASP, NIST, and ISO.
The primary benefit of S A S T is that it catches flaws early, reduces rework, and strengthens code-level security. However, it does have limitations. Because S A S T doesn’t run the code, it can’t detect runtime issues such as improper session handling or broken authentication that depends on application behavior during execution.
Still, when integrated properly into the development workflow, S A S T significantly improves software quality and reduces long-term risk by addressing issues before they’re deployed.
Now let’s move on to Dynamic Application Security Testing. Unlike S A S T, D A S T is a black-box testing technique. It evaluates a running application from the outside, simulating real-world attacks without knowledge of the internal code structure.
D A S T tools interact with the application through standard interfaces—like web pages, APIs, or user input forms—and observe how the application behaves. This allows D A S T to uncover runtime vulnerabilities such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting, server misconfigurations, and authentication flaws.
Because it tests the application in its deployed state, D A S T reflects the real user experience and detects issues that arise only during execution. It also helps verify the effectiveness of runtime security controls like input validation, output encoding, and error handling.
D A S T complements S A S T by identifying vulnerabilities that static analysis can’t detect. However, it’s typically performed later in the development cycle, after code has been compiled and deployed to a test environment. And because it lacks visibility into the source code, D A S T can struggle to pinpoint the root cause of a vulnerability or provide exact code-level guidance.
Still, D A S T remains a critical part of a mature application security program. It ensures that the deployed application functions securely under real-world conditions, providing actionable insights into vulnerabilities that could be exploited in production.
Let’s now explore Interactive Application Security Testing. I A S T blends the strengths of both S A S T and D A S T by analyzing applications from within as they run. It uses agents or instrumentation embedded in the application or runtime environment to observe code execution, data flow, and interactions during testing.
I A S T provides precise vulnerability detection with contextual insights. It can tell you not just what the vulnerability is, but where it occurs in the code and how it’s triggered in real time. This is particularly valuable for complex, modern applications that use multiple languages, frameworks, and third-party components.
I A S T tools are typically integrated into the development or testing environment and can run continuously during manual or automated functional testing. This allows them to provide high-accuracy findings with fewer false positives compared to traditional methods.
I A S T also supports DevSecOps by fitting seamlessly into Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment pipelines, offering near-instant feedback to developers and security teams.
While I A S T is still an emerging technology, it shows great promise for enabling scalable, efficient, and context-aware security testing. It’s especially well-suited for agile and cloud-native environments where traditional testing tools may be too slow or disconnected.
For more information on CISSP certification and other valuable cybersecurity education resources, please visit cyber author dot me. You'll find best-selling books, training tools, and resources tailored specifically for cybersecurity professionals. Also, there are other podcasts on cybersecurity and more at Bare Metal Cyber dot com.
Now let’s compare S A S T, D A S T, and I A S T side by side. Each testing methodology has unique benefits and limitations, and selecting the right approach depends on your development model, application architecture, and security requirements.
S A S T is best for early-stage detection. It provides detailed code-level insights and helps enforce secure coding standards. It’s fast and efficient for catching known patterns, but it lacks runtime context.
D A S T provides a realistic view of application behavior. It identifies vulnerabilities that appear only during execution and helps validate security controls in the deployed environment. However, it may struggle with pinpointing exact locations of flaws in the source code.
I A S T offers the best of both worlds—code visibility and runtime analysis. It delivers high-accuracy findings with rich context and integrates well into automated testing pipelines. The challenge with I A S T is deployment complexity and tool maturity, though these continue to improve rapidly.
In practice, the best security programs combine all three. Use S A S T to catch issues early, D A S T to validate deployed applications, and I A S T to bridge the gap with precision and scalability. Understanding these methods and how they complement each other allows you to build a robust, layered security testing strategy.
Let’s now look at how to implement effective security testing practices. Begin by defining your testing requirements, tools, and workflows in your secure software development policies. This ensures clarity for developers, testers, and security professionals alike.
Integrate security testing tools into your development and deployment pipelines. Automate S A S T scans on every commit. Schedule D A S T scans before every release. Deploy I A S T agents in testing environments for continuous feedback.
Validate tool effectiveness with manual testing, penetration tests, and code reviews. Tools can miss context, so human testers are essential for interpreting results and identifying deeper logic flaws or architectural issues.
Establish structured workflows for vulnerability triage and remediation. Prioritize issues based on risk, assign them to the appropriate owners, and track resolution. Use dashboards and reporting to communicate trends and support continuous improvement.
And train your teams. Developers, QA engineers, and security analysts must understand how to use these tools, interpret their results, and apply secure coding best practices to prevent future issues.
Let’s now examine continuous improvement in security testing. The threat landscape changes constantly, and so do development practices, tools, and environments. Your testing strategy must evolve too.
Regularly review and refine your testing approach based on vulnerability reports, incident outcomes, and stakeholder input. Track metrics like vulnerability density, time to remediation, and testing coverage to assess effectiveness and guide investment.
Encourage collaboration between developers, security teams, and operations. Security should be everyone’s responsibility, and integrating testing into daily workflows builds shared ownership and accountability.
Keep your teams up to date. Run refresher training sessions, distribute threat briefings, and review lessons learned from incidents. A knowledgeable team can respond faster and fix issues more thoroughly.
Finally, automate wherever possible. Automated testing ensures consistency, speed, and scalability—key advantages in agile and DevOps environments.
Thank you for tuning into the CISSP Prepcast by Bare Metal Cyber. Visit baremetalcyber.com for additional episodes, comprehensive CISSP study resources, and personalized certification support. Strengthen your understanding of Security Testing: SAST, DAST, and IAST, and we'll consistently support your journey toward CISSP certification success.